Sweeping a hand over several inches of fallen leaves recently revealed a finger-high mushroom on the slope beside Little Crum Creek.
Its distinctive cap begs identification, and I soon found some resemblance to pictures of the Morchella species of mushrooms.
These highly-prized & edible “true morels” entice all kinds of foragers and mycophiles to the woods around this time of year.
But looks can be deceiving, and mistakenly picking any of the “false morels” could leave more than a bad taste in your mouth. Consuming these poisonous mushrooms might warrant a trip to the hospital.
Stakes like these make the quest for identification rather compelling. So I’ve compiled some information that might help us determine what kind of mushroom I’ve found.
Pennsylvania mushroom expert Bill Russell conveniently categorizes our region’s most commonly found morels into five species. In four of these, the bottom edges of the caps are attached directly to the stem (unlike our mushroom). This characteristic makes them relatively easy to identify as true morels.
But the first appearing morel species of the season is a little different. Its cap attaches to the stem about halfway up inside the cap, and the bottom edge of the cap hangs free from the stem. Thus Morchella semilibera is known as the half-free or semifree morel.
Now an inexperienced observer like myself might easily confuse an edible half-free morel with a poisonous false morel like Verpa bohemica, whose cap edge also hangs free from the stem.
But some sources indicate that, unlike the half-free morel, a poisonous Verpa stem attaches to the topmost underside of the mushroom cap. As Michael Kuo vividly describes, the false morel cap rests on the stem like a thimble on a pencil.
With this distinction in mind, I cut the mushroom in half to see how the cap meets the stem:
Spore color can be another useful clue in identifying mushrooms.
However, in the case of true and false morels, the color range might be too fine to differentiate.
Both Morchella and Verpa spores can be yellow, but Morchella might also range from yellow to cream.
Therefore, I’m not sure a spore print will tip us one way or another, but it’s a fun experiment to try.
It took over 24 hours to obtain this print on glass:
Based on the evidence so far, one might guess this is a true morel, particularly Morchella semilibera.
But I have seen nearly identical mushrooms labeled as Verpa varieties of false morels.
And the only things I’m willing to confirm right now are the difficulty of identifying a mushroom and the need for some input.
So what do you think: true morel (Morchella semilibera), false morel (Verpa bohemica), or something else altogether?
July 9, 2016 at 10:00 pm
Is a true morel. False have a solid stem. True morels have hollow stems.
July 12, 2016 at 2:39 pm
Thanks, James.
May 24, 2013 at 12:18 pm
I’ve only been fortunate enough to find morrels a few times – maybe I’m just not checking the right areas or checking at the right time – thanks for checking out my blog!
June 3, 2013 at 9:36 am
This is the one time I’ve noticed a morel along LCC. And that was dumb luck. There must be an art to finding them. Thanks for returning the visit.
May 29, 2012 at 6:31 pm
I love morels. I didn’t look very much for any this spring. We greened out so fast and way ahead of the norm. Years ago I ate some raw morels in a noodle dish. WRONG THING TO DO! I have found false morels on a few occasions.they have a cottony mass within their hollow areas.
I enjoy your site and photography very much!
May 29, 2012 at 8:19 pm
Thank you, Larry. I didn’t see any morels in the same area this spring, but I wasn’t looking much either.
Thanks for the tip: no raw mushrooms!
May 14, 2012 at 1:22 pm
I vote for half-free. We have a lot of these at our house, in one particular place. Here, they come up a week or two before the true morels. I don’t bother with these at all, since there is not much too them anyway. Wait for the real deal! 🙂
May 14, 2012 at 9:32 pm
Thanks for the advice … I haven’t seen any yet this spring.
April 22, 2012 at 1:35 pm
But did you eat it?
April 22, 2012 at 3:27 pm
Well, by the time I got a positive ID, it wasn’t looking so appetizing.
June 13, 2011 at 9:19 pm
It immediately looked like the edible kind to me, but I didn’t know there was a false morel that’s not for eating.
I used to hunt for morels with my grandmother on the farm and she knew what we were looking for. We’d bring all we could find back to the house, soak them and wash them again and again and again, saute them and savor them. Sooo good! I have hoped to find a patch or two down the creek bank in my backyard, but so far no luck.
June 14, 2011 at 7:47 pm
Sounds like great fun!
Better luck finding some in the yard. Finding this one encouraged me to venture out a way from Little Crum Creek (with some satisfactory results).
May 17, 2011 at 7:15 am
Those are the half free morel. The stem is the dead give away. ALL morels have hollow stems. The false morel has a cotton like fiber stuffing in the stem.
June 14, 2011 at 7:38 pm
Another useful tip — thanks!
May 11, 2011 at 11:02 am
Two other mushroom experts have responded by email.
Like Leon, each have identified this mushroom as Morchella semilibera — the semifree or half-free morel.
May 4, 2011 at 2:38 pm
Hi, Scott
That’s definitely a semilibera — the crosswalls divide the cap into definite individual cells, like a honeycomb. For a Verpa (or Gyromitra) the head is just wrinkly; it doesn’t have definite crosswalls.
You can see more pictures and discussion of how to compare these mushrooms at http://www.mushroomthejournal.com/bestof/firstmorel.html
May 6, 2011 at 9:45 am
Thanks Leon — that’s a useful detail to note. I hope to find some Verpa or Gyromitra species to observe the differences.
Your link to the journal has some great pictures, diagrams, & charts for mushroom ID.
Appreciate your help!